If one's love is strong enough, it can drive one to accomplish feats that are literally impossible otherwise. In general, anything with "-punk" in its name has a strong tendency towards Romanticism, due to the genre's cynicism about human advancement, preference for older and more visible machines, and strongly antiauthoritarian tendencies. However, this isn't a hard-and-fast rule, and many "-punk" works actually lean towards Enlightenment in their embrace of the possibilities of their setting's unique technology. Post-Cyberpunkbeing a reaction against the extreme Romanticism of the Cyberpunk genre, is the most obvious example.
Machiavelli states that all principalities are ruled in one of two ways, either by a prince and his ministers or by a prince and by nobles.
While ministers are subservient to the prince and do not have subjects of their own, nobles derive power from their "ancient lineage" and inspire the love of their subjects.
According to Machiavelli, nobles pose a greater threat to sovereign rulers than ministers because they rely less on the benevolence and favor of a ruler.
Active Themes Machiavelli employs contemporary examples to illustrate the distinctions between the two types of principalities. The Turkish empire is ruled by one prince and his ministers, who are "all slaves bound in loyalty to their master.
Therefore, it is "difficult to win control of the Turkish empire but, once …. Nobles are not dependent on the king for their position; thus, foreign foes can easily find and bribe disgruntled and disloyal nobles.
Therefore, France "can be more easily seized" but can be held "only with great difficulty," because there remain nobles "to raise insurrections. Machiavelli contrasts the two types of government, highlighting their inverse advantages and disadvantages. While disloyal nobles can aid aspiring conquerors, Machiavelli urges established rulers to be wary of these inconstant nobles, who will not hesitate to turn on former friends when it benefits their own interests.
With Darius dead, Alexander had secured the state with difficulty but consequently held it with ease. On the other hand, the Romans, who conquered states that resembled France, won their possessions easily but encountered great difficulties in securing their control.
Machiavelli concludes by stating that "this contrast" does not depend as much on the prowess of the conquerors as on "the kind of state they conquer.
In certain situations fortune plays a larger role in deciding the outcome of events than the prowess of individual rulers.
Machiavelli highlights the ways in which the two forces may work independently or in tandem. Retrieved September 14, Need help with Chapter 4 in Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince?
Check out our revolutionary side-by-side summary and analysis. The Prince Chapter 4 Summary & Analysis from LitCharts | The creators of SparkNotes it can be held with ease." Conversely, a king and a "long-established order of nobles," which derive their status .
Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Renaissance Florence on 3rd May The Renaissance was a time of renewed classical learning, of discovered continents and rediscovered manuscripts, progress in the arts and sciences, and the expansion of horizons literally and metaphorically. This webpage is for Dr.
Wheeler's literature students, and it offers introductory survey information concerning the literature of classical China, classical Rome, classical Greece, the Bible as Literature, medieval literature, Renaissance literature, and genre studies.
year-old Jack Harris (above) fought and died at Gallipoli. The family's vicar, Everard la Touche, wanted Jack to go to war. The vicar believed the war was a battle of good versus evil.
Key Passages in the Analects of Confucius. The title of the Analects, Lun-yü,, of Confucius, we can translate as something like "Discourses and Dialogues" -- Analects,, would be "Digest" or "Collection" from Greek, a title apparently introduced by James Legge ashio-midori.com we have sayings and stories from or about Confucius, or sometimes just about his students.
Think of King Lear, for example. There are a number of characters in that play who have an explicitly Machiavellian cynicism about politics, who believe that politics is nothing but efficacy, the will to power, naked ambition, pragmatism devoid of ethical considerations.